UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND STUDENT COURSEWORK ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT AND PLAGIARISM RULES

The author and the source must be identified clearly whenever the ideas, words, drawings, designs, data, computer programs, performances or creative works of others are used. To view the current version, click the link in the document’s navigation bar. The records must be retained for at least ten years after the student’s graduation from the University. Where an investigator determines that, prior to the submission of the current assignment, a Student had been informed that there have been two or more previously recorded occurrences of proven Inadvertent Plagiarism, the investigation of the most recent allegation shall proceed on the basis that the allegation is of Intentional Plagiarism. Examples of acts of intentional plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules. These reports must ensure that parties involved cannot be identified. Plagiarism that is a result of negligence is included in this definition.

To view the current version, click the link in the document’s navigation bar. Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation. Where the case is dealt with as intentional plagiarism the Student will be provided with a copy of these Rules and will be advised in writing of:. It includes corporations and other bodies falling into one or more of these categories. Where the case is dealt with as intentional plagiarism the Student will be provided with a copy of these Rules and will be advised in writing of:. This report should also specify the nature of the penalty and the final decision-maker in each instance. Appellants should structure their appeal in terms of Paragraph 98 a — c and provide evidence to support their appeal.

A Support Person does not speak on behalf of the Student and is not an advocate.

This is not a current document. An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation or determination of the case.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule

Access to these records is limited to the following mlsconduct nominees: Before any penalty is applied to a student in a partnership arrangement, consultation is to take place between UNE and Partner Representatives to ensure that any penalties are equitably applied across the two institutions. Good scholarship refers to and builds upon the work of others. New evidence should not be accepted unless it can be demonstrated that is was not available at the original investigation.

  MASTER THESIS TLUMACZENIE

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

This penalty may only be applied to breaches specified under Paragraph 10b vi — xii and Paragraph 10c xi — xii. Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation. Andd responses shall be handled as appeals.

This report should also specify the nature of the penalty and the final decision-maker in each instance.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism Rules / Document / UNE Policy Register System

The Support Person must not be a member of the legal profession. Plagiarism that is a result of negligence is included in this definition. Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others.

Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for englaand. They may uphold an appeal or uphold the penalties. Plagiarism that is a result of negligence is included in this definition. A new penalty applied under these od may be appealed in accordance with these Procedures. At the end of each academic year the Records Manager will submit a report to the Academic Board listing by School the number of investigations that were carried out.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism Rules

A Support Person may be a friend, University Representative or family member. Section 1 – Overviews 1 These procedures outline the implementation of the Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule “the Scademic and must be read in conjunction with that Rule.

On completion of the specified period of exclusion, the Student is eligible to return to a Residential College although conditions on readmission may be applied.

Examples of acts of intentional plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules. The Appeal Officer or Committee Chair will forward a report Template A6 and all associated documents to the Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive Officer who will review the case but not receive representations when making a decision. Where the Academic Director is also the Unit Coordinator, the Head of School or miscojduct is authorised to investigate and impose penalties.

  PERSONAL STATEMENT DOS AND DONTS ECFMG

An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation caademic determination of the case.

Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Procedures / UNE Policy Register System

Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation. If the Appeal Officer or Committee Chair decides that the appeal should be dismissed, the appellant will be informed of the details and reasons plagiariem the decision and all avenues of appeal within the University will then be exhausted. Where it is suspected that a submitted assessment task, or part thereof, has not been written by the Jniversity the Unit Coordinator may ask the Investigating Officer to arrange an examination on the relevant topic as part of the process of determination of authorship.

university of new england student coursework academic misconduct and plagiarism rules

The file must be created by the Records Management Office and stored in line with University policy. Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others.

A copy of a reprimand will be held on the student’s individual file. Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited englane, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit.

The records must be retained for at least ten years after stkdent student’s graduation from the University. It plays a major role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes.