In reality we all are critical travelers TO the future. Many authors claim to “explain” the remarkable role of maths and physics by the assumption that it does not exist, i. Faith-based engineering is a perpetual test of faith. The issue how the 7. Allow the congenitally inconsequential and the smartless to die of their own empirical incompetence. Such people usually hate mathematics because they cannot understand it, so they need pseudo-arguments to feel proud of their ignorance. But it’s not even that he tries to defend any obscurantist ideology there:
The question reveals a pitiful degree of hubris an delusion. I cared to make the best essay, altogether scientifically accurate, clear and very insightful and innovative, including but not restricted to. BTW it seems that the public can no longer comment. Such people usually hate mathematics because they cannot understand it, so they need pseudo-arguments to feel proud of their ignorance. Comments posted as “Unknown” go straight to junk.
Sabine, Cold fact is that within year or two whole Earth might be annihilated due to manmade chain reactionso thinking about how to steer the future in general is complete waste of time.
Kimmo, I yet have to check out your essay. But neither chirality nor Descartes ideas on vortices as I once thought was the creative structure that explained everything.
What it truly means, is only one thing: The future is fundamentally not steerable. And me, of course, but one is cqxi enough here. Klingman calls himself “physicalist” here but expressed spiritualism in another essay.
Two parabolas, one larger and perpendicular made with flat mirrors can melt lead, but if we made lens to perfection vqxi practical uses we would melt the pot.
His misunderstanding is to insist on the fact that institutional habits and peer review can be biased, which may also happen in principle, but which is only one side of things; he does not seem to measure the real extent to which science does need a filter to survive in an ocean of bad ideas from amateurs.
I will have more to say about this, however, because science and technology also are changing the actions, the means. Without my rating, you can figure out how absurdly low their rating would have been. What does it mean? The letters on a transparent sheet you mentioned I had never heard of but the effect, implying illusions or facts of nature I did intuit from simpler observations, structural phenomena in thinking about chirality, abstractly the same right and left effect.
When the healers snakes entwine or the Ourobus worm loops to consume itself we all seem to know what the metaphor means for hope and that there fqx be a certain end by congest of belief in the Ivory eszay of ourselves that risks the Neverending Story.
About the FQXI essay contest on the math/physics connection
Tuesday, April 29, FQXi essay contest Posted by Sabine Hossenfelder at 9: It comes across as ethically acceptable due to the voluntary nature of these “apps” should they be called brain apps or etc?
Needless to say, all of these points are addressed in my essay, but then I’m one of those old-fashioned academics who think that peer review sometimes does work just fine. Mathematical Universe Hypothesis mathematical monism. What matters is the opportunity for sane people, able to define the right standards, to get information filtered according to their own standard.
Opponents in such a chess game reverse this in a box or space region that makes such quantized gravity not distinctly top or bottom but a loop. They also need to be the sort of sophisticated, “quality” nonsense able to give idiots the feeling that it constitutes an intelligent, convincing defense of their obscurantist ideology.
Concretely, a big problem with a spinor is that its phase is reversed when you apply to it a rotation with angle 2pi. BTW it seems that the public can no longer comment.
But if the universe is all mathematics it is not a general description for I can think of one model that preserves up and down, omnidirectional gravity determined in the sense that we can see only a little distance forward like an abstract cave wall, right or left illusions aside. Edgar, I develop and apply the rigorously derived concept of dynamic complexity, which is very different from the canonical loose exercises on the subject, does solve problems otherwise unsolvable and gives well-specified and rigorously substantiated answers to questions you mention and also to those about the future of humanity to be decided by the critical choice of today.
This equation describes the field of electronic presence as taking values in the space of bispinors of space-time. The problem I cannot solve is of another, subjective origin. On the other hand, those who appeared best by “community rating” on March 16th were: I especially liked the panoramic view that reached from the big questions to simple examples of flashlights and mirrors.
Andrei, that is a most impressive view and presentation. Allow the congenitally inconsequential and the smartless to die of their own empirical incompetence.
Unitary Flow: FQXi essay contest results
Mathematical Universe Hypothesis mathematical monism QM: Therefore one must clearly, completely understand it all which is not a modest task and then realise the objectively right choice.
Up and down does seem relative to us as we gaze into a flat mirror.
Of course some essays have well-deserved very low rating.